When it comes to the rehabilitation of musculoskeletal trauma, modern clinical medicine imposes considerable demands for measuring the effectiveness, expediency, harmlessness and profitability of treatment and rehabilitation strategies. In addition to the cost-benefit ratio, they include the patient`s feeling about his own health as a measure of the success of treatment and rehabilitation. Therefore, it is necessary to use targeted assessment tools that are applicable in the long term and include both functional outcomes and rehabilitation needs, focusing on patient needs (and unmet needs) and at the same time enabling the unification of these data for broader information on patient care. Accordingly, the aim of this review is to interpret the applicability of targeted measurement instruments and systematize advice on how to use them. The concrete contribution of this thesis is aimed at the systematic introduction of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) into daily clinical practice in traumatology, research and clinical registries in the future. In the literature collection process, we analyzed research databases for medicine and healthcare: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cohrane Library. We considered review papers, clinical research, randomized controlled studies and systematic review papers in Croatian and English. New value-based strategies are combined with learning platforms through which healthcare professionals from different healthcare institutions openly reflect on and discuss their actions. This leads to the transformation and successful investment in value culture. Being aware of what is not effective for the patient can help recreate new ways of care. On the other hand, being aware of is effective can help create security and consistency. Standardizing PROMs and PREMs will simplify the inclusion of long-term outcomes in national registries to improve the quality of care and research. This results in better information gathering and care directing, increased patient satisfaction and reduced visits to healthcare facilities. Based on all the available literature, health professionals who deal with this area should act in accordance with the fact that the recovery of the biopsychosocial aspect also includes the recovery of a person's integrity, i.e. the re-establishment of a complete sense of self that relates to life roles, values, identity and beliefs. For this reason, it is the duty of clinicians to encourage the patient's own engagement and participation in the assessment of recovery.