Introduction: In any rehabilitation process, measuring the range of motion is one of the most important evaluations of the patient. The range of motion is measured before the beginning of the rehabilitation process, during the process and after it, in order to gain insight into the success of the therapy and the functional progress of the patient. Therefore, it is necessary that goniometers, the devices used to measure range of motion, are precise and correct, regardless of the type of the device itself. Objectives: The main goal of this research is to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the results obtained after measuring the range of motion using a classic two-armed or digital Easy Angle goniometer, and which goniometer will measure the range of motion in the hip joint faster. Subjects and methods: 20 subjects between the ages of 18 and 24 took part in the research, of which 7 were men and 13 were women. The devices used in this research are two goniometers; the classic two-armed goniometer and the digital Easy Angle goniometer, as well as a stopwatch.The research was conducted at the beginning of June at the Faculty of Health Studies in Rijeka, in the Physiotherapy Skills cabinet. The respondents were distributed over five days; four respondents per day, and 30 minutes were spent on each respondent. For each respondent, the range of motion in both hip joints was measured with both goniometers, three times for each movement. Also, the time required for the examiner to complete each measurement with both goniometers was measured. To test all the mentioned hypotheses, Student's T-test was used with the level of statistical significance expressed as P < 0.05. The obtained results were processed in the program Statistica 14.0.0.15 (TIBCO Software Inc) and the arithmetic mean and standard deviation data were obtained using descriptive statistics, while the level of statistical significance was shown as P < 0,05. Results: There is no statistically significant difference in the results of measuring the range of motion with the classic two-armed and digital Easy Angle goniometer, while there is a statistically significant difference in the time required by the examiner to measure the range of motion. This research has shown that measuring range of motion is significantly faster using a digital Easy Angle goniometer. Conclusion: Both goniometers have their advantages and disadvantages, but they show angle measurements equally. The digital Easy Angle goniometer is significantly faster in terms of measuring range of motion than the classic two-arm goniometer.