Objective: To investigate the influence of the nurses' motivation to respond to the NPP, whether there is a difference in the motivation of the NPP between those motivated by doctors, nurses or some other source of motivation, whether there is a difference between persons in the family who have or have no illness of some form of malady.Subjects and Methods: 100 healthy subjects of both sexes, aged 50-74, participated in the study. An anonymous questionnaire consisting of 10 questions, an insight into the base of the invited persons at the NPP, a motivational conversation with the invitations, and two group work with the invited persons were used as an instrument of investigation. The results; Out of the total number of invited citizens who did not respond to their call alone, 96 were contacted by phone. Two people changed the address and were no longer available. Out of the remaining 96 people, one person made a search after the call, 7 after the first visit and 5 after the second visit. No person who did the search did not have group work. Finally, a total of 13 (13.5%) respondents made a search after the intervention and received results during the study. Additionally, 11 (11.5%) are ordered tests, 15 (15.6%) are waiting for results and there are 2 (2%) postponements due to health status. Regarding the test results among the respondents whose results we know (n = 22), the two have a positive finding suggesting a 10% incidence of colon cancer incidence. Respondents who are non-respondent after intervention are not different from gender and age. Conclusion: Patrons' nurses have a significant influence on motivation and responsiveness to the NPP. People who respond to the NPP are more likely to work on the staff of the PHC (nurse, doctor) team than other sources of information and family rooms the males with malignant disease are more likely to participate in the NPP than those who did not have a sick member in the family.