Introduction: The Analysis of parameters of gait has a crucial role in the assessment of normal and pathological gait. The function of foot in this analysis is very important because feet represents the main point of support during a walk and also they are constantly adapting to different surfaces and are regularly exposed to high forces. The main goal of this research is to examine the distribution of plantar pressure and to compare two pedobarographs. Materials and methods: In this research, I have examined 45 students who voluntarily choose to participate (64% respondents/examinee were women and 36% were men) and who were between 18 and 25 years old. The body weight of respondents/examinee was 71,31± 12,05 kg, height 1,74 ± 0,08 m, body mass index 20,02 ± 1,76. All respondents were a part of one group and they were measured on two different pedobarographs (MobileMat i Biomech). They were measured in statics and dynamics. Obtained data was processed in a program called Statistica 13.0 who was designed by TIBCO Software Inc. Descriptive statistics provide the following data: arithmetic mean, standard deviation, p value. Results: There is huge statistical difference in the date that was measured by Biomech pedobarograph and in the date that was measured by MobileMat pedobarograph. Statistical difference can be seen in the date measured in statics but also in dinamics. The distribution of the surface of the support on the left foot differs between the two pedobarographs when comparing the left foot, while the distribution of the surface of the support of the right foot is the same, although there are big differences in their values. The biggest differences were observed in the distribution of maximum force and the biggest plantar pressure. Also the Biomech pedobarograph noted almost twice as large values than MobileMat pedobarograph. The results obtained by Biomech pedobarograph are closer to the results obtained by other experts, at least in terms of the distribution of these parameters. Data obtained from measurements in dynamics also differ only in values, while the distribution is the same on both pedobarographs. Conclusion: The informations that this research paper offers are very crucial because they provide data about reliability of pedobarographs. However we should bare in mind that this research is too small to confirm this allegations. Also, this research has shown that measurements should always be performed on the same methods, due to possible differences that are also visible in this paper.