Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease where joint cartilage decays. As a consequence, symptoms of pain and swelling occur, leading to movement restriction. Pain and movement restriction prevent proper walking patterns and activities of daily living.This is why ostearthritis patients are often disturbed. In view of this increasingly common problem in patients with ostearthritis, a study was conducted to examine the impact of Coordinative Locomotor Training (CLT) on improving dynamic balance. CLT is a new method used in rehabilitation and the main goal of its application is to improve the person's balance. The respondents were divided into two groups.In the first group, the subjects practiced according to the principles of CLT exercises and in the second group standard therapy was applied. In both groups, water exercises were conducted and TENS was applied. To compare which exercises were more effective, testing was conducted on the Alpha Stabilometric Platform. The measurement was carried out at the beginning and at the end of 2 weeks. Subjects were tested with 4 different dynamic tests. Each test looked at the length of the trip and the goals achieved.The reason is that the two values are correlated, the greater the number of goals achieved, the greater the path length. The greater the number of goals achieved, or the longer the path, the better the person's dynamic balance. After analyzing the data, a statistically significant value was shown during the exercise in the pendulum compared between the tested groups. In the other tests where the two groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference.The results showed that a statistically significant difference was still found in the track test where the initial and final measurements of the CLT exercise group were analyzed. The hypothesis that the use of CLT results in an improvement in dynamic balance has not been proved in this paper, but according to the aforementioned test of tracks in the CLT group, we can see that there was improvement in that group. The reason why there was no significant difference in other dynamic tests is the short duration of the study and the small number of measurements.Improving this could provide more relevant data on the impact of CLT on improving dynamic balance. The aforementioned topic should continue to be explored with some improvements that would lead to positive insights into the use of CLT and its impact on dynamic balance.