Measurement of range of motion is one of the main components of the physiotherapeutic assessment which determines the range of motion in individual joints. As there are a large number of different types of goniometers the main goal in this study is to compare the specifics of application (precision determined by the range of angular degrees in three different measurements and the time required to perform those measurements) of the classic two pronged goniometer, gravity goniometer and EasyAngle goniometer while measuring the range of motion of the wrist. 20 students from the Faculty of Health Studies, University of Rijeka, participated in the research. The research was conducted at Faculty of Health Studies, University of Rijeka in the the Physiotherapy Skills cabinet. The dana was analyzed and processed in the program Statistica 14.0.0.15 by TIBICO Software Inc. The data was processed statistically and presented graphically and tabularly. The level of statistical significance was expressed as P< 0,050. The results of the research showed that there is no statistically significant difference between the classic two pronged goniometer, gravity goniometer and the EasyAngle goniometer, and all three goniometers give equal results of measurement accuracy. The results of the study also showed that there are statistically significant differences between the three goniometers in the time required to perform the measurements with all three goniometers. Scheffe’s Test showed a statistically significant difference between the classic two pronged goniometer and the gravity goniometer. Father data processing for each movement separately (dorsal hand flexion, palmar hand flexion, wrist radial deviation, wrist ulnar deviation, forearm supination and forearm pronation) showed that there was no statistically significant difference in measurement accuracy and the time required to measure the range of motion of individual movements whit all three goniometers.